← All articles

Quantum Computing Clusters In The U.S.

November 2026

Executive overview

Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, New York and Colorado stand out for dedicated state-backed quantum initiatives. Other important ecosystems include Connecticut, Tennessee, Massachusetts, California and Wisconsin. Public investment, research capability and available procurement budgets are distinct measures and should not be conflated.

1. Reported state-level quantum funding

State

Allocated (USD M)

Outstanding (USD M)

Illinois

726.3

21.0

New York

366.5

—

Maryland

301.9

15.0

New Mexico

166.8

255.0

Connecticut

86.0

—

Colorado

78.3

13.4

Tennessee

65.0

—

Massachusetts

39.3

40.0

Florida

24.9

20.0

South Carolina

15.0

—

California

13.7

—

Arizona

8.9

—

Ohio

7.0

—

Indiana

4.7

—

South Dakota

3.0

—

Pennsylvania

0.0

40.0

2. Leading states and quantum centers

Illinois | Chicago

Key centers: Illinois Quantum and Microelectronics Park; Chicago Quantum Exchange; University of Chicago; Argonne National Laboratory; Fermilab.

Strategic relevance: Major dedicated infrastructure and public-private ecosystem.

New York | Long Island, New York City and Upstate

Key centers: Stony Brook University; Brookhaven National Laboratory; NYU quantum fabrication initiative; IBM Research.

Strategic relevance: University hubs, fabrication and commercial research.

Maryland | College Park

Key centers: University of Maryland; Joint Quantum Institute; IonQ; DARPA benchmarking ecosystem.

Strategic relevance: Capital of Quantum initiative and research/defense partnerships.

New Mexico | Albuquerque

Key centers: Sandia National Laboratories; University of New Mexico; Roadrunner Quantum Lab; planned commercial research facilities.

Strategic relevance: State-supported campus development and R&D incentives.

Colorado | Boulder and Denver

Key centers: JILA; University of Colorado Boulder; NIST Boulder; Elevate Quantum.

Strategic relevance: Quantum Tech Hub and shared-facility commercialization.

Connecticut | New Haven

Key centers: Yale Quantum Institute; QuantumCT.

Strategic relevance: Hardware research and industry translation.

Tennessee | Oak Ridge and Knoxville

Key centers: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; University of Tennessee; Quantum Science Center.

Strategic relevance: Quantum-HPC integration and scientific applications.

Massachusetts | Cambridge and Boston

Key centers: MIT; Harvard; MIT Lincoln Laboratory.

Strategic relevance: Research talent, algorithms and quantum networking.

California | Bay Area and Los Angeles

Key centers: UC Berkeley; Stanford; Caltech; UCLA; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Strategic relevance: Commercial quantum hardware and venture ecosystem.

Wisconsin | Madison

Key centers: University of Wisconsin–Madison; Wisconsin Quantum Institute.

Strategic relevance: Quantum devices and regional research partnerships.

3. Additional states with active ecosystems

State

Institutions / initiative

Focus

Arizona

University of Arizona; Arizona State University

Photonics and quantum networking

South Carolina

South Carolina Quantum Association; university programs

Education and regional industry development

Florida

University of Florida; University of Central Florida

Photonics, sensors and research

Texas

UT Austin; Texas A&M

Semiconductors and quantum devices

Ohio

Ohio State University

Materials and workforce

Indiana

Purdue University

Quantum devices and algorithms

Pennsylvania

University of Pennsylvania; Carnegie Mellon

Research and commercialization

Utah

Utah Quantum Initiative

Emerging statewide coordination

4. References

  • Illinois Quantum and Microelectronics Park — https://iqmp.org/
  • University of Maryland quantum research — https://quantum.umd.edu/
  • Colorado quantum incentives — https://choosecolorado.com/colorado-resources-for-quantum-tech-hubs/
  • New Mexico Economic Development — https://edd.newmexico.gov/
  • Stony Brook University — https://www.stonybrook.edu/
  • U.S. DOE Office of Science — https://www.energy.gov/science